No you implied I was. On Oct 17, 2013 11:48 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Bruce I was not implying you were being racists, I have seen no evidence of > such. I was saying that many of those who support impeaching the president > are motivated in part by race. For instance the Loudoun County head of the > Republican party advocates impeachment. During the 2008 election she passed > around images of Obama as a witch doctor and as an ape. Now tell me that > her motivations are not in part racially based. I've gathered the same > impression when I read the screeds of other impeachment activists as well. > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Since you threw out the race card after I have made very clear I could > > give two shits about anyone's color( I'm not going to answer you Larry. > > > > Sent from my iPhone 4S. > > > > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 11:38 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > No I am trying to understand your twisted reasoning in this case. I > > simply > > > cannot see the justification here. obama has done nothing more or less > > than > > > Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, or Bush II. > > > > > > Perhaps we should retroactively impeach them too. > > > > > > Or is it the difference as far as many of these impeachment advocates > are > > > concerned the offense is that he's presiding while black. > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:14 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> And if you think we're somehow morally equivalent, I feel sorry for > you. > > >>> On Oct 15, 2013 10:04 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> again what is the difference? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I think those are spies and saboteurs, criminals, and should be > hunted > > >>> like > > >>>> rabid dogs. But I'm not in charge. > > >>>> On Oct 15, 2013 9:39 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Only engage legal combatants? So a sniper like these two cases were > > >>>>> shooting at a target where the combatants were jihadis. > > >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arron_Perry > > >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Furlong > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Their targets were not wearing any sort of uniform. So tim you've > > >>> changed > > >>>>> your definition of legal combatant? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Judah McAuley < > [email protected] > > >>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> My bad, sorry about mixing that up. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>> Judah > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:26 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Not a sniper. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> A scout. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> There's a difference. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Uniformed snipers can only engage legal combatants. They are > > >> very > > >>>> much > > >>>>>>> part of the conventional forces today, often fulfilling the same > > >>> need > > >>>>> as > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> machine gun team in overwatch. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Larry was an infantryman too. He knows all this. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367895 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
