well, i am not so paranoid that i dont' use the word mailman. but its NOT inclusive, really. mailperson is inclusive.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:06 am Subject: RE: RE: RE: Scholars Expect Pledge Ruling Reversal > No, that was the perception. That is what I am getting at. It is all > about perception. > > Mailman is inclusive, it also allows me to be lazy, fewer clicks. > > Mailwoman just doesn't sound right, mailman has a better flow. Not > because of the meaning, just the way it sounds. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Beth Fleischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:58 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: RE: RE: Scholars Expect Pledge Ruling Reversal > > > > except that mailman has gender. > > mailperson or mail carrier is a noun with no gender > > the point is that the default gender is male > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
