If it becomes TRULY gender neutral, woud we go to the personbox to see if the person person has delivered the person yet? <hee hee>
> well, i am not so paranoid that i dont' use the word mailman. > but its NOT inclusive, really. mailperson is inclusive. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:06 am > Subject: RE: RE: RE: Scholars Expect Pledge Ruling Reversal > > > No, that was the perception. That is what I am getting at. It is all > > about perception. > > > > Mailman is inclusive, it also allows me to be lazy, fewer clicks. > > > > Mailwoman just doesn't sound right, mailman has a better flow. Not > > because of the meaning, just the way it sounds. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Beth Fleischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:58 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: RE: RE: Scholars Expect Pledge Ruling Reversal > > > > > > except that mailman has gender. > > > mailperson or mail carrier is a noun with no gender > > > the point is that the default gender is male > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
