Thanks Jerry, a much better explanation than I'm capable of.
On Jul 15, 2014 12:31 PM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> As with most things, I don't see it so cut-and-dry.
>
> You are not really talking "responsibility", you are talking "moral
> culpability" I believe.
>
> And I don't think it falls on any one group.
>
> Israel is culpable for firing the weapon. And for allowing the situation to
> sink to the point they have to.
> Hamas is culpable for "forcing" Israel to fire, knowing full well the
> consequences of their actions.
> The civilians who elected Hamas are culpable for making terrorists their
> elected government, knowing full well the type of government to expect.
> The civilians who allow rocket launchers on their apartment rooftops are
> culpable.
> Iran and Syria and China are culpable for arming Hamas with rockets.
> The Arab countries are responsible for forcing the Palestinians into those
> camps, and using them as pawns.
> Egypt is culpable for keeping the Gaza borders locked down.
> America is culpable for arming Israel. And for not forcing a better
> solution 10 years ago. and 20. and 40.
>
> There are degrees of culpability.
>
> But I guess here is my bottom line (that these talks have helped me
> solidify).
>
> There is no excuse or reason for Hamas to fire rockets into Israel. None.
> Zero. Not helping their cause, not helping their people, not helping their
> military objectives. The ONLY point for them to fire is to force a response
> from Israel, causing destruction and death to their own people, and then
> crying foul.
>
> They are the Suarez of the Middle East. Ow! Hit hit my mouth!
>
> All else flows from those rockets.
>
> And nothing else good will come to them while that is their only tactic.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hamas would be responsible for any deaths from those missiles.
> >
> > Israel would be responsible for any deaths resulting from any counter
> > attacks.
> >
> > As I mentioned to Sam, I think you guys are conflating the words
> > 'responsible' and 'justified'.
> >
> > I am not talking about whether any of these actions is justified, rather,
> > who is responsible for the deaths.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:06 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > So over night the Israelis took part in a cease fire organized by
> Egypt.
> > >
> > > Hamas chose not to take part and fired 50 additional missiles
> > > On Jul 15, 2014 9:56 AM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If you're going to analogize, at least put it in perspective.
> > > > Let's say ranchers in CA, TX and AZ constantly fired missiles into
> > > > Mexico every day. Mexico tells the US government to make them stop or
> > > > they will fire back and the US did nothing. Then, Mexico called,
> > > > emailed, texted and dropped leaflets to the houses, churches and
> > > > schools that were firing the missiles explaining when and where the
> > > > bombs would land. If the ranchers rallied more people to go to the
> > > > target sites to die for the cause than that's on the ranchers and the
> > > > people that showed up at the scheduled time. Unless Mexico went to
> the
> > > > sites and checked, how would they know if civilians were there? Then
> > > > you have to say to yourself, if these people are willing to die to
> > > > send a message, they are probably willing to strap a bomb on and go
> to
> > > > a crowded market so good riddance. But no, the Mexican government
> > > > sends more notices pleading people to leave the targets at the given
> > > > times, they use more precise weapons to limit casualties and they
> > > > still get called the terrorist. It's called propaganda and you are
> > > > buying into it.
> > > >
> > > > .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK..so if Mexico launched an attack on the White House and
> civilians
> > > that
> > > > > lived or worked near the intended target died, Mexico would be
> > absolved
> > > > of
> > > > > those deaths as long as they warned us ahead of time?
> > > > >
> > > > > And, sorry, but they are still 'people'. maybe not people we like,
> > but
> > > > > people nonetheless.
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, absolutely befuddled this is coming from you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371551
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to