Only in your mind is that true. Just because you 'start' something, does not mean the other person is a 'victim'. There are plenty of times where the person who 'started it' got their asses kicked and would be considered more the 'victim' than the other person.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > It shows you support B as the victim. You've taken sides over who is > right or wrong. Compassion for those wronged. I didn't say she joined > the cause. But if Israel is wrong, for not negotiating honestly, then > how can they earn her trust - I mean fear them less - than she does > the terrorists. But we'll never know because she always goes into > attack mode when questioned. > > . > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You are so dense sometimes. Saying 'person A' started a fight does not > mean > > that you automatically sympathize with 'person B'. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> You need to clear your head and think for a minute. Two people are > >> fighting. You say person on the left started it. You are sympathizing > >> with the person on the right. That doesn't mean you're sending money > >> or taking up arms, it just means you feel they are being wronged. > >> > >> . > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > So basically you cannot see the obvious flaw in your logic. > >> > I guess we will all need to leave you to deal with that yourself. > >> > > >> > Saying that a government is not dealing straight with X, does not mean > >> that > >> > you sympathise with, or agree with what X is doing. > >> > > >> > The person making the statement has repeatedly clarified what they > meant, > >> > and said unequivocally that they do NOT agree with what X has done, > >> > and yet you persist in mischaracterizing their comments. > >> > > >> > To keep trying to defend that point is, quite frankly, ignorant. But > many > >> > people have tried to explain it, and you won't accept it. > >> > Which to me implies that this is a deliberate attempt on your part to > >> > inflame the discussion. > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371669 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
