You said 'she was looking for trouble' - the implication being that she got it..and it was deserved.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Rick Faircloth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you quote me stating that Ray's response was justified? I don't > think so, because > it wasn't. I imply nothing; you misinterpret my remarks. The problem is > on your end. > > You just don't understand the nuances... > > > On 9/9/2014 1:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > Oh, so when you said it reeks of 'she was asking for trouble' you did not > > mean to imply that his response was justified? Because that is what you > > have done - numerous times. > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Rick Faircloth <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> Quote where I stated this was an appropriate "quid pro quo," you > asshole. > >> > >> And, our current atmosphere of an unequal playing field for men and > women > >> causes serious misjudgements to be made in our courts of law, you > asshole. > >> > >> > >> On 9/9/2014 1:04 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>> The fact that the charges against her were dropped and that he was > >> charged > >>> with more serious charges kind of deflates your argument. > >>> > >>> If you honestly view this as a qui pro quo, you are a worse human being > >>> than I could possibly imagine. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Rick Faircloth < > [email protected] > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> What was totally unfair. The battery by both should be considered in > >>>> isolation, > >>>> according to the violence perpetrated. We can't go down the road of > >>>> considering > >>>> the victim of the battery to determine whether the battery is an > >>>> offense, you asshole. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9/9/2014 12:55 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>> They were both charged, but charges against her were dropped and he > was > >>>>> ultimately charged with more serious charges. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> She cussed him, spit on him, and then slapped him before getting > into > >>>> the > >>>>>> elevator. > >>>>>> She was knocked out when her head hit the railing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It wasn't "appropriate" force, but the fact that they were BOTH > >> charged > >>>>>> says something about the overall incident. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9 September 2014 11:02, Rick Faircloth <[email protected] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If a woman doesn't want to risk being hit by a man, then SHE needs > to > >>>>>>> exercise restraint before she starts a physical confrontation. In > >>>> today's > >>>>>>> world > >>>>>>> of EQUALITY all bets are off at that point. No one should be > allowed > >> to > >>>>>>> attack > >>>>>>> someone physically and then be exonerated of all guilt and > >>>> consequences. > >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372217 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
