Michael Dinowitz wrote: > Thanks. The search has to use a post for 2 reasons. The first is that I'm expanding >it out to include options of searching on subject, poster, message content, and date. >This is a lot of info for an URL.
Is it? If I compare to URL lengths at Google etc. that is not bad. > The second is that I'd rather not have people passing along complete search urls. >Pass along the links found. It'll be easier for the system and will be more exact. Do >you really want to answer a question with 40 links where many may be irrelevant? I do prefer to pass on complete search urls. I don't want to just hand them the solution, I want to learn them how to find the solution themselves. And generally the problem is to little returned answers, not to much :) Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
