I still have to read up on indexing SQL2k text fields, so I'll keep an open mind. If there's not to much of a hit from it, I'll consider it. Of course, now that I think of it, I may want to track the search criteria that people use. :)
> Michael Dinowitz wrote: > > Thanks. The search has to use a post for 2 reasons. The first is that I'm >expanding it out to include options of searching on subject, poster, message content, >and date. This is a lot of info for an URL. > > Is it? If I compare to URL lengths at Google etc. that is not bad. > > > > The second is that I'd rather not have people passing along complete search urls. >Pass along the links found. It'll be easier for the system and will be more exact. Do >you really want to answer a question with 40 links where many may be irrelevant? > > I do prefer to pass on complete search urls. I don't want to just hand > them the solution, I want to learn them how to find the solution > themselves. And generally the problem is to little returned answers, not > to much :) > > Jochem > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
