> Office XP isn't that much different to 2000 imho, but it does > pay to keep upto date, since you have the licences, why not use it?
Outlook XP holds email addresses you've used without them in the Address Book, Outlook 2000 doesn't Outlook XP is slower though, when doing a Send/Receive, it can take an absolute AGE! Oh, one bonus is that Office XP doesn't have the HORRIBLE "one item in the task bar per document" option unless you want it... Note that you don't need to be running WinXP to use OfficeXP, Win2000 will run it quite happily Philip Arnold Technical Director Certified ColdFusion Developer ASP Multimedia Limited Switchboard: +44 (0)20 8680 8099 Fax: +44 (0)20 8686 7911 www.aspmedia.co.uk www.aspevents.net An ISO9001 registered company. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ********************************************************************** ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
