Given Shrubs latest set of speeches, we do sound that arrogant. All too often it seems that this country just picks and chooses what laws it follows. Now if another country did that the US would be all over it like a cheap suit.
There are times such hypocrisy is really irritating. larry -- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:55 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > We're not THAT arrogant to admit that :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Smyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:46 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > surely its more like, we're the most powerful nation in the > world and we're > going to do what the **** we want cause no one can stop us > > its the ways things tend to work, so why not just say it?? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 October 2002 16:37 > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > Interesting. > > So essentially, what you are saying is: > > We can ignore the UN if we want, but Iraq cannot. > > It seems an inconsistent position. > > will > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 01 October 2002 16:32 > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > Not to add too much fuel to the fire, but the U.S. is not > beholden to the > U.N. The highest laws of the land for the U.S. are U.S. laws. > We choose to > agree to abide by international laws because it generally > makes things go > smoothly. > > I'm not saying we _should_ snub our noses at the U.N. in all > of this, just > that we can if we so choose. > > Kevin Graeme > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:58 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > > > > and the US does ignore the UN: > > > > http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/2002/usa09252002.html > > > > plenty more: > > > > http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/usa/index.html > > > > w > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 01 October 2002 15:41 > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > > > > ermm it's true. that information is free for oyu to find out by > > yourself. > > "We" do have tons of nuclear bombs, "we" did ignore geneva > > accords, "we" did > > arrest citizens unlawfully. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:53 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Interesting read > > > > > > Rubbish. The whole damn thing. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Interesting read > > > > > > I dont know if Khatami actually said this, but if he didn't, he > > should have. > > The tables have turned... > > > > > > > > The Case for Regime Change > > > > > > > > NEW YORK--Making the case for United Nations ( news - web sites) > > intervention against the United States, Iranian President > Mohammad Khatami > > ( news - web sites) told the organization yesterday that > military action > > will be "unavoidable" unless the U.S. agrees to destroy its > > weapons of mass > > destruction. > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
