Actually it wasn't a direct reference to you, but please feel free to take it as such.
As an argument it holds more water than the Titanic that is the WMD position, or for that matter the moral outrage position. w -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 13:25 To: CF-Community Subject: The Choice Before Us //snip but don't forget, we aren't allowed to talk about oil. we'd be stupid if we thought that's what it was all about. //snip Obviously your are referring to my comment to Maureen. I never said you were stupid if you thought that, just that you lose credibility in my eye, as that argument doesn't hold water. Think about it. If this were really about oil, what would be easier. Moving large number of troops and equipment, straining tensions with allies, risking American lives, fighting a war, or relaxing sanctions, allowing more oil to flow from Iraq, and working with more inspectors and containing Saddam. I'm sure the French would go for that. So, if you really want to think it's all about oil, you go ahead. Kevin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
