Kevin: If this is the case, then why hasn't France & Germany brought it up? Why not Saddam in Dan Rather interview?
Sorry, I just don't see this as possible truth until, unless it gets more mention by the foes of invasion. Andy -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:03 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Personal Stance Change for Iraq Policy Not according to Scott Ritter and two interviews with other UNSCOM guys that I've heard or read. Apparently, the type of chemical/biological weapons they were making were extremely hard to store for long periods of time. From all these interviews, the common thread is that the materials wouldn't last more than two years even refridgerated. As for why we haven't been hearing about it, Ritter was talking about this months and months ago, well before the inspectors went back in. I've noticed a lot of things like this that the media has opted not to cover in favor of "Countdown to War" or whatever to get ratings. He also mentioned that he has close ties with the Israeli intelligence and that Israel keeps close tabs on what materials are going in to Iraq that could potentially be used to restart production. Other than a couple aluminum tubes, there apparently hasn't been anything going in to restart production. At least those were his comments. He did however support the inspectors going back in because Iraq IS under sanctions. -Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:30 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Personal Stance Change for Iraq Policy > > > Dude! Most of those chemical weapons last forever! If they only lasted a > year or two, nobody would stockpile them or even make them. > > DRE > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:45 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Personal Stance Change for Iraq Policy > > > > > > One UNSCOM inspector does not an expert make. The shelf life > > sounds very interesting. I wonder why that hasn't been > > brought up anywhere yet? If true, you would think that > > Saddam would have mentioned it... > > > > If you break up the word "expert", you get "ex - has been" > > and "spert - drip under pressure". > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:58 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Personal Stance Change for Iraq Policy > > > > > > > adios, so long, bye bye. He's hiding weapons, he can't produce > > > evidence that he destroyed his WMD, > > > > Funny, I just heard an interview with yet another UNSCOM > > inspector that said there was virtually no possibility in his > > professional opinion that Iraq has any WMDs because what they > > had didn't have a shelf-life past 2 years and they don't have > > the manufacturing facilities to make more. > > > > Kinda hard to produce evidence of something if it doesn't > > exist. Now the question is, do you believe Bush or do you > > believe the experts? > > > > -Kevin > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
