If the Americans don't get him, the French, Germans and/or Russians will make sure he never gets a chance to tell the world about their 'help' to him over the years. Dead is dead.
> Saddam, if we are lucky enough to capture him alive, will be sent the Hague > for war crimes/crimes against humanity, as will his sons. > > Andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:48 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation... > > > Sunday, March 23, 2003, 7:00:05 AM, you wrote: > > SC> Jerry > > SC> See also my other follow-up posts. However, in summary: > > SC> - Saddam in an evil and despotic nutcase = TRUE > SC> - Saddam needs to be removed from power in Iraq = TRUE > SC> - Saddam should be tried by the ICC for whatever they deem fit = > SC> ABSOLUTELY TRUE > > I sincerely doubt the US would be any part of handing Saddam over to > the ICC. He will be dead, or be sent into exile. > > SC> - The current military action is legal by a member of the UN (as AU, US > SC> and UK are) = FALSE > > Says who? Napoleon was the one who said the winners write the history > books. They also write the laws. The US as a major contributing force > the in _winning_ of WW2, helped create the UN, and these laws we are > supposed violating. It doesn't get much simpler that the fact that, > the winners always win. Unless the coalition loses in Iraq, your > statement is provably false in light of history. > > Go ahead quote Chapter 7, article 50-whatever that everyone else > parrots. I've read it, and it has nothing do do with what is going on > in Iraq. Even if someone, say the abomination that is the ICC, were to > have the balls to bring charges, would you volunteer to come collect > the accused to stand trial? > > They say the meek shall inherit the earth, but the meek stand no > chance while people like Saddam are still around. If peace is to have > a chance, people like Saddam can not exist, and while it seems that > most people agree that Saddam is like you say, evil and despotic. Can > you tell me why then, in the 12 years after the gulf war, no one other > than the US and UK have attempted to put forward any motion in the UN > to get rid of him? If not for the US forces, Saddam would probably > still be holding on to Kuwait today. If not for the US forces, Japan > would probably be ruling Australia today. If not for US forces, Soviet > or Chinese style Communism would be the form of government for the > majority of nations in the world. Sometimes forces is necessary > without the approval of a bunch of self-serving UN members. > > SC> - So, leaders of AU, US and UK need to be sanctioned = TRUE > > > > -- > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
