I don't remember anyone disagreeing with the accusations, only with the timing. Could you please point me to the quotes from the French that disputed the claims?
And as far as fabricating(lower case, no need to shout), I expect that the CIA et al, was interpreting to favor one perspective versus another. For example, have you seen the trucks that they have found. They were not for making candy, but also don't show signs of being used yet. However, if you where to see the trucks that appear to only have one purpose, what conclusions would you draw? Andy -----Original Message----- From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:29 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Operation Iraqi Eradication You are not responding to the point: 1) LACK OF EVIDENCE was what was preventing the UN from unanimously deciding to attack Iraq. 2) It seems the United States FABRICATED EVIDENCE to justify an attack. OR are you deliberately not addressing the issue, because your opinion is that it does not matter if the US government lied to its people and the world, and waged war on another sovereign country? -Gel -----Original Message----- From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] the only reason that the UN needed was Saddam. Un is a bunch of pussies so they wouldn't do shit so the US did. That is the only reason neccessary, shrub is a moron but regardless of fabrications or whatnot there was a just cause, and good has been done and will be done. Guess it doesn't matter people who complain about the us will always find a reason to complain. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
