Not harsh at all. Not nearly as harsh as the Nixon comparison. Here is what I see. There are people out their who truly hate GWB. Hate him with equal or greater passion then those who hate the Clintons. They see everything he does as something evil. They (you?) truly believe: 1. He stole the election 2. Forced the supreme court to do his bidding 3. Caused 9/11 or at best, let it happen through sheer incompetence 4. Crashed the stock market 5. Forced California into an absolutely stupid energy policy 6. Created Enron to make money for his friends from California's ignorance 7. Lead of the states into bankruptcy 8. Come on, I know there is more here, everyone chip in.....
Sorry, I just don't buy it. And by continuing to support such a ridiculous list of accomplishments completely undermines areas of real concern. Andy -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:21 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Operation Iraqi Eradication Sorry if that response of mine seemed a bit harsh. I just recall strongly arguing about the red-herring argument about the WMD well before the war started, but I was repeatedly derided and given the brush-off. Now, I'm just generally sitting back and eating my popcorn with a bit of wistful sadness for the gullibility of the US people. Bottom line: GWB makes Nixon look honest. -Kevin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
