it seemed from the link provided on this thread that people following happened:
Single, age 60 30k annual income..............11.5% savings Unmarried HOH one child 30k...................27.9% Married 2 children 50K........................42.3% Single 0 Children 50k.........................4.2% Married 2 kids 100k...........................19.3% Single 0 kids 100k............................8.03% Married 2 kids 300k...........................9.94% It seems like those with 2 kids and making 50k a year get the most savings percentage wise. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:58 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: What the Bush tax cut could have paid for > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:48 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: What the Bush tax cut could have paid for > > so am I wrong? > > Are most of the workers in this country employed by the wealthy minority? > I > know in my company that is true... Wrong about what? Your statement or your implication? The statement "most people are employed buy the wealthy" is absolutely true. The implication that those people then deserve a largest tax break is questionable at best. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
