That would be the MS party line...COM is dead, .Net is in. Everyone should upgrade. Blah Blah Blah.
Perhaps COM was intended for desktop apps at first, I don't go back that far, but that was absolutely false by 3 or 4 years ago. MS made the createObject function for something... -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, May 29, 2003, 1:50:25 PM, you wrote: NM> I was talking to a guy from MS, who deals directly with DB and COM, he told NM> me that COM should be avoided with ASP. It is evil, the intent was for NM> desktop applications, it was never intended to support multiple threads, or NM> do a number of other things ASP developers are making it do. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:26 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: CFMX vs ASP.NET >> >> You'd make me happy. I had to write an app in ASP simply because CF >> couldn't use the COM components. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Christian Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:16 am >> Subject: Re: CFMX vs ASP.NET >> >> > On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 12:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> > > CF (all versions) COM support stink. >> > >> > We are very aware of this issue, and that a lot of our customers >> > would >> > like to see this fixed. This is actually a very high priority of >> > ours. >> > Christian >> > >> > >> NM> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
