<g> have a chocolate croissant and an expresso :) Dana
John Stanley writes: > Damn, sorry Dana....you wrote Chretien, and I read Chirac. I really thought > that's who you were referring to. Need to get some glasses or something.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:32 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: More on Iraq's non-existant WMDs > > > watch it :) he's from Quebec and he's the prime minister of Canada. > > Interestingly, his daughter was in my class at school for several years, > though looking back I can't remember and can't imagine why they were in > Edmonton, which is very definitely NOT in Quebec :) COme to think of it I > can't imagine why we were in Edmonton, lol. > > Dana > > John Stanley writes: > > > Just my 2 cents, and more than a humorous poke than anything else. > > > > I'm not sure that I would trust the French on deciding who is safe from > who. > > ie, the Maginot Line versus the Nazi's > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:21 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: More on Iraq's non-existant WMDs > > > > > > I am not sure what you perceive my position to be. I am not sure I have > > one, apart from massive doubt and skepticism, personally. I did however > > agree with Chretien when he said Saddam is surrounded and neutralized so > > that goal is already met; what's the point of invading? > > > > My short answer: I will look at anything. Believe is another story. > > > > Dana > > > > Andy Ousterhout writes: > > > > > Howie, > > > Interesting, but besides the Powell transcript, not really anything new. > > And > > > even that could be taken out of context. In fact, I would be surprised > if > > > anyone who was making public statements wasn't privately challenging the > > > evidence in order to protect their integrity. > > > > > > The good new about all of this conjecture is that we will either find > > > weapons or not. If we don't, then many folks, including anyone running > > for > > > election, is likely to strongly question how we made that mistake and we > > all > > > need to insure that answers are found. > > > > > > At this junction, an interesting question is : if we do find WMD, how > > many > > > of you will reverse your positions and say that we were right to invade > > > Iraq? > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:35 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: More on Iraq's non-existant WMDs > > > > > > > > > http://slate.msn.com/id/2083760/ > > > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,968603,00.html > > > > > > > > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/05/31 > > > /MN163599.DTL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
