>Andy Ousterhout wrote: >> >>The fundamental question for me is did the administration properly question >>the information that it received to create a balanced view and go into this >>situation with a solid understanding. > >This equates to "are they stupid?", which I don't find the most >important question.
No they were probably so fixated on Iraq probably having WMD's that any contrary evidence was simply ignored. Group think again. > > >>If Bush >>believed that there were no WMD's but decided not to tell us because he >>believed we still needed to overthrow Saddam, then he also needs to be held >>responsible for lying to the American people. > >.. and the rest of the world. He won't be however, with control of a slavish Congress and Judiciary, Bush will most likely get away with it. larry -- Larry C. Lyons ======================================================== Life is Complex. It has both real and imaginary parts. ======================================================== Chaos, Panic and Disorder. My work here is done. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
