hehe i meant speeding :)

"When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: A good american


> despite my determination to end this thread I find myself compelled to ask
> just how you would wind up in jail for spending?
>
> Dana
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:11:48 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > See there you go :) Don't break the law and you won't have to worry as
> > much.
> >
> > Hell i realize i could goto jail for spending so if it happens i can't
> > very
> > well complain they threw me in jail because i knew i was breaking a law
> > that
> > is there for a reason.
> >
> > :>
> >
> >
> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was
good
> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
off!"
> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 1:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >
> >
> >> OK... actually that does contain a *glimmer* of sense. You can lose
your
> >> mind that way though, trying to imagine everything that someone *might*
> >> dime you for. Don't yeall at your kids -- someone might call cps. Don't
> >> chain your dog outside -- someone might call the humane society. Don't
> > talk
> >> about your taxes -- someone might turn you in for not paying your full
> >> complement of Social Security. Don't let your parking meter run out....
> >> I
> >> mean, how was he supposed to imagine that someone would accuse him of
> >> spying? And on a social level not a group level it's not really fair to
> >> have one guy over here accused of spying for the Chinese (presumably
> >> because he is Chinese) and in solitary confinement for months on end,
> > while
> >> other people walk around unhampered... is it?
> >>
> >> Dana
> >>
> >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:52:24 -0400, William Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok and if he hadn't broken rules that were not really ever enforced
he
> >> > wouldn't be in trouble.
> >> >
> >> > Its a prime example of why not to break rules even if everyone else
> > does.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was
> > good
> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people
> > off!"
> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:58 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Bill. Please tell me what you think peer pressure has to do with
> >> this?
> >> >> The
> >> >> guy was accused of espionage and the government later says whoops we
> > are
> >> >> sorry and released him.
> >> >> The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to him. Are we
even
> >> >> talking about the same case??
> >> >>
> >> >> Dana
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:34:41 -0400, William Wheatley
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > :) If he hadn't broken the rules do you think he would have been
in
> >> >> > trouble??
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Sucks to be him but i bet hes been saying if i hadn't given into
> >> peer
> >> >> > pressure to break the rules i wouldn't have been screwed. LOL
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I
> >> was
> >> > good
> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
people
> >> > off!"
> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:06 PM
> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> ::sigh:: The judge and the prosecuting attorney apologized to the
> >> >> guy.
> >> >> >> But
> >> >> >> ok, think what you like. Have a croissant.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Dana
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:48:45 -0400, William Wheatley
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > No in other words if you know people are going to be gunning
for
> >> >> you
> >> >> >> > don't
> >> >> >> > give them a reason to make them get you. Don't break the rules
> >> if
> >> >> he
> >> >> >> > hadn't
> >> >> >> > he'd be fine nobody really to blame for the situation starting
> >> but
> >> >> >> > himself.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure,
I
> >> >> was
> >> >> > good
> >> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
> > people
> >> >> > off!"
> >> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:23 AM
> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I just saw this. I think you aren't thinking before you write.
> >> A
> >> >> > Chinese
> >> >> >> >> scientist was singled out, possibly because he is Chinese.
> >> > Subsequent
> >> >> >> >> investigation revealed that the problem was facility wide and
> >> the
> >> >> >> >> University of California was fired as administrator. No other
> >> >> >> scientist
> >> >> >> >> were charged with espionage let alone spent a year in jail. I
> > have
> >> > no
> >> >> >> >> idea
> >> >> >> >> whether he is suing or not; I just think he got a raw deal.
> >> There
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> > little
> >> >> >> >> point in nitpicking over this one case since neither one of us
> >> is
> >> >> >> >> looking
> >> >> >> >> up the details; my point is, there is at least a distinct
> >> > possibility
> >> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> as he always maintained, he had no contact with the Chinese
> >> >> >> government,
> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> >> was merely a little sloppy like every other one of the several
> >> >> >> thousand
> >> >> >> >> employees of the facility, not one of whom was also jailed.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> In other words, good thing we didn't shoot him.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Dana
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:14:31 -0400, William Wheatley
> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > Just because everyone does it is no excuse. When I get
caught
> >> >> > speeding
> >> >> >> > do
> >> >> >> >> > I
> >> >> >> >> > say..everyone does it.. lol no.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Well as I said I've seen reports on both sides of it. He
knew
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> rules
> >> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> >> > he broke the, just because everyone does it doesn't mean you
> >> >> >> should.
> >> >> >> >> And
> >> >> >> >> > he
> >> >> >> >> > deserves the scrutiny he got for it. IF he wants to sue go
> >> for
> >> >> it
> >> >> >> if
> >> >> >> >> not
> >> >> >> >> > well that's on him.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills.
> >> Sure,
> > I
> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> > good
> >> >> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts
> >> > people
> >> >> >> > off!"
> >> >> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Tierney"
> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM
> >> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> AFAIK he did nothing worse than take a laptop containing
> >> >> >> classified
> >> >> >> > data
> >> >> >> >> >> out of its prescribed area. It later developed that this
was
> >> >> very
> >> >> >> >> often
> >> >> >> >> >> done at Los Alamos, and many laptops are just plain lost.
UC
> >> >> just
> >> >> >> >> lost
> >> >> >> >> >> its
> >> >> >> >> >> contract to run the place due to slovenly security.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> I don't know if he is suing. I am sure it would not endear
> >> him
> >> >> to
> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > US
> >> >> >> >> >> government if he did.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Dana
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> William Wheatley writes:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Oh well better safe and in jail until its proven if there
> > was
> >> >> >> > evidence
> >> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> >> >> > think you were a criminal in the first place. Is he
> >> sueing??
> >> >> If
> >> >> >> >> they
> >> >> >> >> > were so
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrong why doesn't he have his clearance back??
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > I mean if it was me i would be pissed i was in jail but i
> >> >> would
> >> >> >> >> > understand
> >> >> >> >> >> > they can't let me roam free with national security
> >> interests
> >> >> >> like
> >> >> >> >> >> that.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > He can sue to get his stuff back if it was that unjust. I
> >> >> read
> >> >> >> on
> >> >> >> > both
> >> >> >> >> > sides
> >> >> >> >> >> > of the story.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > He was still lookign rather unsavory maybe he realizes he
> > got
> >> >> >> off
> >> >> >> > easy
> >> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> >> >> > not to push his luck
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills.
> >> >> Sure,
> >> > I
> >> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> >> > good
> >> >> >> >> >> > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it
> >> puts
> >> >> > people
> >> >> >> >> > off!"
> >> >> >> >> >> > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> >> >> >> >> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney"
> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> >> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:00 PM
> >> >> >> >> >> > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > suuuure the system worked; the guy spent a year in
jail,
> >> >> and
> >> > I
> >> >> >> > think
> >> >> >> >> > he
> >> >> >> >> >> > > lost his security clearance. Hard to get work as a
> >> nuclear
> >> >> >> > physicist
> >> >> >> >> >> > > without one. All for something which subsequent
> >> >> investigation
> >> >> >> >> >> revealed
> >> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> >> >> > > be SOP at Los Alamos.
> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > Dana
> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > William Wheatley writes:
> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Sure thats why you dont summarly shoot them and let
> >> them
> >> >> >> goto
> >> >> >> >> >> trial
> >> >> >> >> >> > first.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Now if its wartime and you are a spy well you're dead
> >> >> meat
> >> >> >> no
> >> >> >> >> >> trial
> >> >> >> >> >> > needed
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > sometimes by law but he was found innocent. System
> >> >> worked..
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no
> >> skills.
> >> >> >> Sure,
> >> >> >> >> I
> >> >> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> >> >> > good
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume -
> >> it
> >> > puts
> >> >> >> >> >> people
> >> >> >> >> >> > off!"
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dana
> >> Tierney"
> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > I am not really in favor of anyone being shot. A
spy
> > in
> >> >> >> >> wartime
> >> >> >> >> >> > *might* be
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > an exception. However, the scientist I mentioned
was
> >> >> >> accused
> >> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> >> > spying
> >> >> >> >> >> > for
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > China, and later on they dropped all charges except
> >> >> one,
> >> >> >> >> >> something
> >> >> >> >> >> > like
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > failing to follow proper procedures with classified
> >> >> data.
> >> >> > And
> >> >> >> >> >> this
> >> >> >> >> > was
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > probably because the man had already been on jail
> >> >> almost
> >> > a
> >> >> >> > year;
> >> >> >> >> >> > proper
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > procedures were so rarely followed at Los Alamos
> >> that
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >> contract
> >> >> >> >> > for
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > running the place was recently revoked. Point is,
> >> >> >> sometimes
> >> >> >> > they
> >> >> >> >> > are
> >> >> >> >> >> > wrong
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > about "spies" too.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Dana
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > Wayne Putterill writes:
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > :)
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > I'm a pacifist, I won't ask for anyone to be
shot.
> >> >> I'll
> >> >> >> >> even
> >> >> >> >> > give
> >> >> >> >> >> > them
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > the rights they deny other prisoners.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:17
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > I don't want to talk to the men in black this
> > week.
> >> >> >> >> >> Therefore
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > I have to disagree with you. If we were talking
> >> >> about
> >> >> >> >> other
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > penalties.... I might not.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Wayne Putterill writes:
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > True, in my opinion Bush and Blair may have
> >> both
> >> >> >> >> betrayed
> >> >> >> >> > their
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > respective countries by deceiving the
> > population.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > From: Dana Tierney
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Sent: 11 June 2003 16:03
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > I suspect that "those who would betray this
> >> >> >> country"
> >> >> >> > has
> >> >> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > lot of room in it for argument. I am pretty
> >> >> sure
> >> >> > that
> >> >> >> > if
> >> >> >> >> >> I
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > agreed with you on the statement, you and I
> >> >> would
> >> >> > not
> >> >> >> > be
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > agreeing on who should be shot. So that
> >> throws
> >> >> up
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> > huge
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > caution flag in my opinion.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Dana
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > John Stanley writes:
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Not at all. Those who would betray this
> >> >> country
> >> >> >> > should
> >> >> >> >> > be
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > shot. Those
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > who serve valiantly this country deserve
> >> our
> >> >> >> >> respect
> >> >> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > admiration.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons
> >> >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:55 AM
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: A good american
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Let me put it this way, the sort of
belief
> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> >> deifies
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > veterans etc
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > is as
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > dangerous as those who would gladly
betray
> >> >> this
> >> >> >> >> >> country.
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > At 09:35 AM 6/11/2003 -0400, John Stanley
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >While I hardly think
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >that my survival depends on the
> > sacrifices
> >> > of
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >> > military,
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >Let me clarify, do you mean that you do
> >> not
> >> >> >> >> respect
> >> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > veterans who
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >have served and sometimes died for the
> >> >> Untied
> >> >> >> > States?
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
http://www.cfhosting.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to