YUP you know i'm fired up when you can't understand a god damn thing i say lol. You should call me boomhowser or whatever that guys name from King of the Hill is.
lol one day i'll get the problem taken care of but not today. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: RE: woo hoo > Ha! You're criticizing Bill for that? Just you wait. Get him on a rant > and he'll really cut loose with the non-sensical grammar and spelling! > When Bill posts, an English teacher loses her wings...or breaks her > chalk...or something. > > -Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nagy, Daniel J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:13 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > you mean, 'better than' ? :) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:12 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > lol gotta do better then that bubba. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:01 AM > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > *point will to a dictionary to learn to spell lying..* :) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:58 AM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > i didn't see anything in there about republicant's being lieing > > > scumbags > > lol > > > > > > Go back to the source until you can get it right > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:38 AM > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > Introducing the two newest political parties: > > > > Republicants and Demobees > > > > > > > > Here are just some of the features of the two new parties. Please > > > > feel > > > free > > > > to add more. > > > > > > > > Republicants > > > > Pros: > > > > 1. All live in the same nest. > > > > 2. Work together > > > > 3. Only one is in charge > > > > 4. No religious agenda > > > > 5. Only some of them have huge mandibles > > > > 6. The only big business is keeping the nest viable > > > > 7. Everyone shares the parenting of babies > > > > 8. Leaving a scent trail is very important > > > > 9. The leader is a Queen > > > > 10. Can bite and bite and bite. > > > > > > > > Cons: > > > > 1. Attacks and attempts to destroy other republicant > > nests 2. Only > > > > some have wings 3. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > > > > > Demobees > > > > Pros: > > > > 1. All can fly > > > > 2. The leader is a Queen > > > > 3. Abortion? We need every baby. > > > > 4. All live in the same nest. > > > > 5. Everyone is sterile except the queen and mates. > > > > 6. Flowers == good > > > > 7. Special interest is honey > > > > Cons: > > > > 1. To figuire out what they are telling you, you have to > > understand > > > > dancing 2. Some are a killer species > > > > 3. After they sting you they die > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:19 AM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > >Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > > > > >others? > > > > > > > > Funny, this is generally a left wing issue. Usually you will find > > > democrats > > > > backing this, and citing health reasons to do so. Don't get me > > > > wrong, > > the > > > > republicans have plenty of other bad ideas :) > > > > > > > > Timothy Heald > > > > Information Systems Specialist > > > > Overseas Security Advisory Council > > > > U.S. Department of State > > > > 571.345.2235 > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 2:44 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > Our Mayor is pushing hard for a total ban on smoking in > > eateries. The > > > main > > > > reason is his campaign contributors. He almost got it > > passed, when we > > > have > > > > a > > > > city council election and 7 members were turned out and the new > > > > members > > > will > > > > not > > > > go along with it. It seems that about half of the > > restaurants in town > > > are > > > > by > > > > the owners' choosing are already smoke-free, as are most > > of the fast > > > (spell > > > > that > > > > junk) food places. He quickly switched gears and said he would > > > > bring it > > > up > > > > for > > > > a public referendum, That is getting nowhere fast as > > well, because > > > > the newbie council members have rejected the call for an > > election as > > > > well. It > > seems > > > > that > > > > the restaurant association feels the public has plenty of choices > > > > for > > > places > > > > to > > > > dine, and they are perfectly able to choose the smoke-free, or the > > divided > > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurants. > > > > This is a city where two (now former) city councilmen, > > three members > > > > of > > > the > > > > local community college board, and several members of a > > local school > > > > district are under indictment for official corruption, > > bribery. etc. > > > > It seems that the medical lobby is biting themselves ever > > since they > > > > railroaded > > > > through (after failing three times) a law to fluoridate > > the municipal > > > water > > > > supply, using the "cavities in children" argument. Then > > they recently > > > > started > > > > another campaign to try to get public funding for free > > dental care > > > > for > > the > > > > "many > > > > children with cavities." When they were rebutted with > > the argument, > > "Why > > > > hasn't > > > > the fluoride treatment removed all that risk, as you claimed it > > > > would a couple of years ago." They did not have an > > answer, and now > > > > there is a movement > > > to > > > > repeal that law as well, because it was a lie to begin with. Our > > > > atmospheric environment is right on the edge of being in > > > non-compliance > > > > with > > > > EPA regulations due to smoke from Mexico and Central > > America in the > > > spring, > > > > and > > > > pollution from refineries in the Houston area (200 miles > > away) that > > > > cigarette smoke is in reality a non-issue, being so > > insignificant to > > > > the overall > > air > > > > quality situation. Our power company has just won > > approval to build > > > > an additional coal-fired power generation plant, with the > > claim that > > > > it > > will > > > > not > > > > add to the deterioration of the air quality. Geez! When > > will the > > > > truth ever be told? > > > > Again, I still believe it should be the restaurant owner's sole > > decision, > > > > based > > > > on his own market analysis to run a smoke-free or > > > > smoking/non-smoking restaurant, and allow the market decide to > > > > either patronize them or not patronize them. > > > > > > > > Why must the right wing constantly and always want to control > > > > others? > > Why > > > > are > > > > non-smokers so stupid that they cannot decide to not patronize an > > > > establishment if smoking is so offensive to them, and there are > > > > plenty of choices to > > > dine > > > > in > > > > the atmosphere they choose? > > > > > > > > And I am a non-smoker/non-drinker. > > > > > > > > ====================================== > > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > > > ====================================== > > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Nagy, Daniel J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 11:48 AM > > > > Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > > > > > > > > > | they are -not- public. they can cater to whomever they > > wish. if a > > > > restaurant > > > > | owner does not want to permit smokers, or if the public want > > > > | should > > lend > > > > him > > > > | more profit and he decides he wants this, so be it. a > > restaurant > > > > | owner > > > can > > > > | throw out whatever trash he doesn't want in his establishment. > > > it's -his-. > > > > | > > > > | if you take great exception to that, dont : > > > > | > > > > | * Walk down a public street. Carbon Monoxide is > > terrible for you. > > > > | * Drink beer, milk or eat red meat. These promote fat > > growth and > > > > | cholesterol. > > > > | * Use a cell phone, or be near an electrical tower. > > Brain cancer > > > > | for everyone. > > > > | * on and on and on. > > > > | > > > > | if -you- don't want to be around smokers, that's fine > > and dandy. > > > > | but > > who > > > > are > > > > | you to make demands of the owner of a private business, > > and what > > > > | right > > > > does > > > > | the government have to forbid the use of a legal > > product on their > > > > premesis. > > > > | if you don't like the menu, you don't have any right to demand a > > change. > > > > get > > > > | up and walk your ass out into the street. just watch > > out for that > > carbon > > > > | monoxide. > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | -----Original Message----- > > > > | From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > | Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:43 PM > > > > | To: CF-Community > > > > | Subject: RE: woo hoo > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | Restaurants are public as well. If you want customers that is. > > > > | > > > > | And I take great exception to anybody killing me, slowly or > > > > | quickly. > > > > | > > > > | -------------- > > > > | Ian Skinner > > > > | Web Programmer > > > > | BloodSource > > > > | Sacramento, CA > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
