Yea i have it i played it a bit but got too much into Morrowwinds i need to go back and play it i liked it because it looked like MOO3. Though i did like moo3 i was disappointed a bit ----- Original Message ----- From: "jon hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:42 AM Subject: Re: Blizzard no more :(
> Speaking of non-graphics oriented games, anyone tried Galactic > Civilizations? I bought it over the weekend after mostly because they > made the game downloadable and I wanted to support that model. I never > understood why online only games made you go to he store and buy the > CD. > Now I'm addicted though...it's what MOO3 should have been. The level > of complexity is a little low, but it's concentration on playability > totally makes up for the relative simplicity. It's not Civ3 quality, > but very very close. > > -- > jon > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Wednesday, July 2, 2003, 11:06:06 AM, you wrote: > WW> Well us non graphics oriented people are a niche market and niche markets > WW> can make some good $$. > > WW> It would be shallow of me to judge a game based on graphics alone instead of > WW> the whole game itself. So they will leave and start their own company then > WW> and make due i guess > > > > WW> ----- Original Message ----- > WW> From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > WW> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > WW> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:43 AM > WW> Subject: RE: Blizzard no more :( > > > >> I disagree. > >> > >> Part of the thing about Blizzard's appeal is that they DID make BIG > >> BUDGET games that were epic. > >> That CG art and animation was top notch and movie quality. Can't do that > >> on a small budget. > >> The amount of time they took to bring their games to market while > >> keeping their development teams well paid is another thing you can't do > >> without a big budget. > >> > >> Blizzard = Big Budget. > >> > >> And no, in today's gaming landscape no one wants to play a game without > >> top notch graphics. That's the big lure. > >> The graphics. People who will accept sub par graphics if the 'gameplay' > >> is good are a minority. > >> > >> Even me, I've been PC gaming since I was 8 with titles like Shamus and > >> Zaxxon, DigDug.Ultrabots...etc. Now, when I check out a game I head > >> straight for the Screenshots page. > >> > >> -Gel > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> oh well i'll just buy the games from the people when they start a new > >> company. Of course they sold themselves out to begin with so they don't > >> really have room to talk. Nobody forced them to stop being who they were > >> or to sell themselves or to even stay after they were bought out. They > >> can go by themselves and tough it out people who like good games will > >> buy games that aren't big budget games though i know its nice. Like > >> combat mission series i really like there games because they are true to > >> life and realistic even if they aren't the best graphically or what not. > >> > >> but i will follow the guys who made blizzard what it was because i like > >> the work they do. > >> > >> > >> > WW> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
