What that article doesn't mention is that AT&T was apparently appointed the contract to oversee the National Do Not Call administration and enforcement. From what I've read, AT&T is also the largest telemarketer. Fox guarding the henhouse.
-Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Nagy, Daniel J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:02 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: National Do Not Call web site > > > http://money.cnn.com/2003/07/02/news/companies/telemarketers/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:58 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: National Do Not Call web site > > > Not really, because this list is growing all the time. If the > goal is to eliminate domestic telemarketers (and it should > be), then all possible combinations should be registered. The > 0 factor is the only one that truly affects the result set, > because any time you dial 0 you are connecting to an operator. > > Let the feds deal with the bad numbers. > > M > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:53 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: National Do Not Call web site > > > A quick check of one site came up with 380 area codes > currently in use in the US. So that should cut times of all > models by almost 2/3rds. Shouldn't it? > > -------------- > Ian Skinner > Web Programmer > BloodSource > Sacramento, CA > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
