yeah I saw that. Am still not clear on whether it was borrowed from the school or one of the other kids' parents. I dont guess it matters; my primary point is that the kid had a right not to have a movie of him distributed without his permission. IE when you put it on the internet it isn't home movies any more.
Dana William Wheatley writes: > I left the link to it it was on waxy where HE left the tape in the Camera > and after an extended period of weeks someone else found it. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:04 PM > Subject: Re: RE: Fat Brat sues, Now is Teasing > > > > (confused) what did they do, copy it? Anyway, my point is that the parents > > of these other kids apparently need to take this more seriously than they > > have. > > > > Dana > > > > William Wheatley writes: > > > > > :) But now we know they weren't thieves. he left the tape so it wasn't > > > really stolen from him. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:38 PM > > > Subject: Re: RE: Fat Brat sues, Now is Teasing > > > > > > > > > > mmmm not sure about Quebec but when this guy was stripping parts off > my > > > > truck the police told me they couldn't do anything because I hadn't > > > > actually seen him do it. > > > > > > > > In any case I think the civil suit puts the responsibility where it > should > > > > have been all along, with the thieves' parents. > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > William Wheatley writes: > > > > > > > > > File a criminal compliant but don't sue for emotional distress. > > > > > I'm all for the thieves getting in trouble for being thieves but its > a > > > life > > > > > lesson learned and sure give the kids that stole a record and be > done > > > with > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:39 PM > > > > > Subject: RE: RE: Fat Brat sues, Now is Teasing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's kind of my feelings. There is a lot of talk about the kid > just > > > > > > dropping it, and life lessons learned, and basically for him to > take > > > > > > responsibility for his own actions (recording the tape in the > first > > > > > place). > > > > > > > > > > > > But why doesn't that statement apply to the kids that stole and > > > published > > > > > > the tapes. They have no responsibility? They have no life lessons > to > > > > > learn? > > > > > > > > > > > > Or do we just say, well you can't get prevent all teasing so lets > not > > > > > bother > > > > > > with any of it, no matter how grievous. Throw our hands in the > air > > > and > > > > > walk > > > > > > away? Sweep it under the covers with blanket statements like > "we've > > > all > > > > > > been teased" and "Kids will be kids". In other words, the > lesson's > > > > > learned > > > > > > for them, are you can get away without responsibility if you can > make > > > > > enough > > > > > > people laugh? > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm sorry, but if the tape was stolen and published without > his or > > > his > > > > > > parent's permission, then I think that is fairly well defined in > the > > > law > > > > > as > > > > > > being illegal. So why should this kid give his legal rights up, > just > > > > > > because he's not popular? > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- > > > > > > Ian Skinner > > > > > > Web Programmer > > > > > > BloodSource > > > > > > Sacramento, CA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:23 AM > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > Subject: RE: RE: Fat Brat sues, Now is Teasing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course the real world is mean. However, that doesn't mean we > stand > > > > > > for it. In the corporate world, there are rules to prevent > disruptive > > > > > > behavior since it leads to an unhealthy workplace. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I originally made my point, it wasn't to say that we should > end > > > all > > > > > > teasing, since that will never happen. I was saying that maybe we > > > should > > > > > > just be more strict against those who do verbally abuse others, > even > > > if > > > > > > they are 'just kids.' > > > > > > > > > > > > -rc > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:14 PM > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > Subject: Re: RE: Fat Brat sues, Now is Teasing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even when you teach compassion its still going to happen the > > > > > > > world will never be utopia. And yes i was teased but i knew > > > > > > > what it was like so i've always tried to help out people who > > > > > > > were in similar situations but come on this kid was just > > > > > > > asking for it lol. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People can't always be compassionate either, its not a matter > > > > > > > of teaching kids to be teasers or not. I think it will happen > > > > > > > regardless and we all have to make it through the writ of > passage > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
