I find the statistics rather suspect. When I see things like "as much as"
20 to 50 percent, I think fudge factor. "As much as" means that this is an
example of a high number. I smell industry press release. At best this is
anecdotal.

It also seems to assume that there are more smokers than non-smokers, which
I believe is no longer the case.

While it might be true that smokers along a state line are choosing to
drive further for a chance to smoke, I question whether all those smokers
in the middle of the state have suddenly quit drinking and eating out. We
are two months into a smoking ban in Albuquerque and I see no difference in
restaurant numbers around here. I am coughing less.

Dana





 

jon hall writes:

>   http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/08/03/smoking.boon.ap/index.html
> 
>   Those hordes of non-smokers that never ate out because of smoking
>   allowed in restaurants just don't seem to exist.
> 
> -- 
>  jon
>   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to