I wonder if there is a market for a smoking both... you know, like a tanning booth, except that you are exposed to a few pounds of airborne carcinogens and can sufficiently damage your lungs in one session that you don't have to inflict poisons on the rest of us...
Dana William Wheatley writes: > LOL NO vents just stick them in an enclosed box and let them all choke to > death on each others fumes. Hell you probably wouldn't even have to smoke > just inhale everyone elses smoke yummy. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:16 AM > Subject: Re: Where are the non-smokers? > > > > Actually, I don't ever think there was a message that non-smokers did not > > frequent bars & restaurants because of smoking. the ban was to > non-smokers > > that work in those places, and to protect non-smoking customers from being > > exposed to smoker's air. > > > > That being said, and the fact that I have fully supported the smoking ban > in > > a restaurant, if the facts are true that banning smoking is causing > > restaurants to lose that much (30% - 50%) of their business, then I > support > > repealing the ban in favor of very stringent rules for separating the > > smoking section from a non-smoking section - e.g. completely enclosed > > smoking areas, different ventilation systems, etc. Of course, that does > not > > protect the non-smoking workers. I don't know what to do about them. > > > > - Matt Small > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:54 AM > > Subject: RE: Where are the non-smokers? > > > > > > > Well... > > > > > > It does say something about Non Smokers. > > > > > > If you ban smoking...and you lose 20% to 50% of your sales... > > > > > > Then that means you have lost smoking customers. > > > > > > It also means that those smoking customers whom you have lost, have > > > *not* been replaced with non-smoking customers. > > > > > > Part of the reasoning for the ban was that there were thousands of > > > non-smokers that do not frequent bars and restaurants because of the > > > smoke,ergo if there was no smoking these people would patronise these > > > institutions. > > > > > > -Gel > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > That doesn't say anything about non smokers it simply says the smokers > > > are going where they can still pollute the air thats all. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
