that would be ideal of course but ultimately this guy is a manager. It is
possible to be a good manager and improperly use "which"... that is why
there are spellcheckers, grammar checkers and secretaries. Of course, he
may also be a fool who has a poor grasp of grammar... but not passing that
test doesnt prove it to me.

dana

s. isaac dealey writes:

> I dunno ... maybe I'm just not good at "suffering fools" (the definition of fool of 
> course always being a subjective personal definition), but I think in order to be 
> getting a salary of 6 figures as a government paid school administrator, you'd 
> better damn well have a pretty adept command of the national language. If you're 
> earning 6 figures doing something else that's not education or language related 
> (translator for instance) like construction, etc. I don't care -- but I'd like to 
> know that when the government pays someone a salary well in excess of 3x what I've 
> ever made in a year to make sure that kids get taught English, I want that person's 
> command of the language to be _indomitable_. (exaggerating for emphasis of course -- 
> although it's true he makes more than 3x what I've ever made). 
> 
> Original Message -----------------------
> er...does not correspond to idiomatic English
> 
> Dana Tierney writes:
> 
> > Well it seems to me that if his English was all that broken he would not
> > have made it to superintendant. There are a good many fluent or native
> > English speakers, possibly including me, who could not pass a test on
> > formal grammar in English, because we have not had to learn it. Are you
> > really clear on when to use me and when to use I? The "correct" answer does
> > correspond to idiomatic English. Same thing with which and that. However,
> > if the guy has been suspending teachers over this and he can't pass it
> > himself, that smells of hypocrisy unless this is one of those mandated
> > tests we are seeing so much of. Personally I am opposed to high-stakes
> > testing, especially for children, but this is just another instance of its
> > idiocies.
> > 
> > Mind you you get no argument from me on the quality public schools ... even
> > the best are far more concerned with keeping students' behavior in line
> > than they are in academics.
> > 
> > Dana
> > 
> > Heald, Tim writes:
> > 
> > > The guy said he had problems with the rules of English, because it was his
> > > second language.
> > > 
> > > I don't want him in charge of my son's school district.  This is why my sons
> > > will both be attending private schools.
> > > 
> > > Timothy Heald
> > > Information Systems Specialist
> > > Overseas Security Advisory Council
> > > U.S. Department of State
> > > 571.345.2235
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:55 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Exciting....
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't think not passing the test means he is incompetent I think it means
> > > the test isnt measuring what it is supposed to measure.
> > > 
> > > Dana
> > > 
> > > s. isaac dealey writes:
> > > 
> > > > How does an incompetent person get a 6 figure government job? ... 
> > > > 
> > > > Original Message -----------------------
> > > > Hmm, it ought to kill the superintendent, not you.
> > > > Well, his job anyway...
> > > > /Ben
> > > > 
> > > > > This kills me. 
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > http://www.cnn.com/2003/EDUCATION/08/03/superintendent.test.ap/index.html
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to