<![CDATA[Who says he didn't deserve it? He should have been dealt with when we
fought Iraq in 1990. Why, exactly, is Saddam more deserving of
punishment than, say the Saudis, anyway? Is beheading a fair punishment
for you? Cutting off hands and fingers? Torture? I mean, if that's
the only criteria for liberating people, why not invade Saudi Arabia?
If Bush's monosyllabic foreign policy is that clear-cut, we should be
invading dozens of countries *right now*; yet we've only invaded one,
and failed completely to uncover exactly what it was we went in there for.
- Jim
John Stanley wrote:
>What really peeves me is that people whine about Saddam, as if he was such a
>great person and didnt deserve it. I'm saying we should have done what we
>did a long time ago.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:49 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: This really disgusts me!
>
>
> From the attached link:
>
>"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with Sept. 11,"
>
>Bush said.
>
>Now they can play semantics all day long, but I contend that this
>
>administration sold this war on the outrage of the 911 attacks and
>
>successful linking in the publics mind of Iraq<->Al-qaeda<->911 attacks.
>
>And what really peaves me is that most people "admire him because he's
>
>honest". ????
>
>No Proof Iraq Tied to 911
>
><http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Arti
>cle_Type1&c=Article&cid=1063836612213&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972
>154>
>
>Marlon
>
>]]>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
[
Todays Threads] [
This Message] [
Subscription] [
Fast Unsubscribe] [
User Settings]
![]()
