No, it was because he was going to be able to destroy London in 45 minutes with... um... really, really bad vibes. - Jim cantrl. a wrote: >I thought it was because Sadaam was planning to send paratroopers down into our homes to tell our woman folk how to make our hot dish. > > > > > > >>From the attached link: >> >>"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with Sept. 11, >>" >>Bush said. >> >>Now they can play semantics all day long, but I contend that this >>administration sold this war on the outrage of the 911 attacks and >>successful linking in the publics mind of Iraq<->Al-qaeda<->911 >>attacks. >> >>And what really peaves me is that most people "admire him because he's >> >>honest". ???? >> >>No Proof Iraq Tied to 911 >><http://www.thestar. >> >> >com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c>=Article&cid=1063836612213&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154> > > >>Marlon >> >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to