actually getting punished for being married, Erika. That's one sucky thing
about our legal definition of marriage and how it affects couples.
three correctly used "you're's" Deanna
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erika L Walker-Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
> But aren't the mormons allowed more than one wife?
> What about the harems? Or is that sraying off topic ...
>
> It's not uncommon ...
> <shrugs>
> To each their own in the end, doesn't really affect me. I've always
> taken care of myself and I've yet to take advantage of any marital tax
> breaks or advantages or anything of the sort since I still pretty much
> keep everything under my maiden name.
>
> Let there be chaos!
>
> Sorry it's ruined your day day Matt. Have a plate of muffins ...
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News
>
>
> On this point, if two people want to have a committed, loving
> relationship, why can't three? Why not ten? Where does the number two
> come from? Tradition? Society? You're insinuating that polygamy is
> wrong.
>
> It sounds like now we're pushing past your comfortable area. I happen
> to think marriage is between a man and a woman. You (I'm inferring from
> the message) think it's between any two people. Somebody else might
> recognize it between six people. Where does it end?
>
> - Matt Small
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
