my dictionary already has more than four definitions of marriage.  
mar�riage    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (mrj)
n.
  1..
    1.. The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife.
    2.. The state of being married; wedlock.
    3.. A common-law marriage.
    4.. A union between two persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage: a same-sex marriage.
  2.. A wedding.
  3.. A close union: "the most successful marriage of beauty and blood in mainstream comics" (Lloyd Rose).
  4.. Games. The combination of the king and queen of the same suit, as in pinochle.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Matthew Small
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:56 AM
  Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News

  Because same-sex marriage advocates want to modify the definition of marriage.

  First defintion: one man, one woman
  Second: any two people
  Third: any group of people

  - Matt Small

  ----- Original Message -----
    From: BethF
    To: CF-Community
    Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:02 PM
    Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News

    I just wanted to know how same sex marriage is related to polygamy?  You haven't answered.

    I personally dont' understand polygamy, but I don't care.  If it makes people happy....
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Matthew Small
      To: CF-Community
      Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:03 AM
      Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News

      On this point, if two people want to have a committed, loving relationship, why can't three?  Why not ten?   Where does the number two come from?  Tradition? Society?  You're insinuating that polygamy is wrong.

      It sounds like now we're pushing past your comfortable area.  I happen to think marriage is between a man and a woman. You (I'm inferring from the message) think it's between any two people.  Somebody else might recognize it between six people. Where does it end?  

      - Matt Small

      ----- Original Message -----
        From: BethF
        To: CF-Community
        Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:18 PM
        Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News

        Where does the logic that same-sex marriage logically leads to polygamy?

        Homosexual people also have families.  They have children, and partners, just like you do.  How does it being recognized as a legal contract hurt traditional marriage?
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Matthew Small
          To: CF-Community
          Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:35 AM
          Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News

          I don't think I agree with you - the basic precept of marriage is to create a family structure, and swinging violates that precept since it introduces an outsider into the structure.  The family structure is central to ours and most societies, which is why there is a push for same sex marriages by homosexual couples.  Why get married if you want to include others?  Only for the licensing, as Jim Campbell tells me. I guess the next logical step for the court to take is to allow marriages of three or more people - and it will happen.

          - Matt Small
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: Heald, Tim
            To: CF-Community
            Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:02 AM
            Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News

            Realistically adultery is a religious construct.  You look at the various
            polyamory movements and swingers and so forth and see groups that don't
            believe in monogamy, and they are perfectly happy with their choice.  Now
            obviously you need to look at it kind of like contract law too I guess.  If
            you agree to monogamy during your vows you should be somehow bound, but
            altering the vows to allow extra marital relations should certainly be
            allowed.  The military has some very out dated laws regarding sexuality
            still.  Sodomy of any kind, even when consent is given, is prohibited.
            That's just silly in this day and age.

            Tim

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
            Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:58 AM
            To: CF-Community
            Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News

            I was just thinking the same thing...

            Obviously, adultery has no consistent meaning in a legal sense and all
            definitions of it should be thrown out until something that works can be
            discovered. This should apply to religious institutions as well.

            Should mean Erika is released from any monogomous obligations she
            previously felt bound by, Gel.

            M

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
            Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:51 AM
            To: CF-Community
            Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News

            So let me get this right...

            In Massachusetts, same-sex marriages are ok

            But in New Hampshire, if you are married and have an affair with someone
            of
            the same sex, it is not adultery.

              _____  


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to