just because they havent found anything doesn't mean that they are not
there. jeez, they havent found Saddam either, does that mean he never
existed, or that they got rid of him too before the war started?


I dont believe the US did anything wrong in this situation, except for not
acting sooner. The Iraqis lost the first gulf war which they started. In
order to end the war they signed a bunch of papers saying they wouldnt do
certain things (wmd's being only on of them), they then proceeded to violate
many of those conditions (like extended range missiles, allowing inspectors,
etc).


When you lose a war and sign a surrender, which is a contract, and you
violate the articles therin, then you are back to a state of war.


Did I miss something? Or is that what happened in Iraq?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush gives the finger to the world again

Personally, I want America to feel this economically. I want the us to have
to pay the price for lying and attacking with no provocation.

I say that as a staunch supporter of America. It's tough love. If we do
something wrong, we shouldn't reap the benefits. It's that simple. I don't
want the US to be the Mafia of the world.

-Kevin

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again

> the us and the other sixty-odd countries who helped us get to bid. now I'm
> not arguing the fact that the us companies may get the bulk of the
> contracts, but I as a taxpayer would rather my money go to US companies
than
> another countries.
>
> i am also not arguing that there wont be corruption in the contract
process,
> ahem Halibuton, but it is still better than the French getting my money.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
>
> Why should US companies benefit from a war manufactured by our own
country?
> When organized crime does that it's called a "protection racket".
>
> -Kevin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:32 AM
> Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
>
> > The countries in question can still do business with Iraq, they just
cant
> > bid on the contracts that the US taxpayers are paying for. They can be
> hired
> > as subcontractors for the contracts as well. I dont see why this is such
a
> > huge deal? Why should the US taxpayers pay french companies to rebuild
> Iraq
> > when they werent willing to support the US efforts in the first place?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:28 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >
> >
> > Former top U.S. officials are blasting the Bush administration for
> reopening
> > a rift with Europe by excluding critics of the war from prime contracts
> for
> > Iraq's reconstruction.
> >
> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html
<http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> > <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> >
> > "I thought we were in the process of acquiring support rather than
> > alienating it," former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (search)
> said.
> >
> > So let me get this straight.
> >
> > 1. Economy is bad.
> > 2. Find a patsy country and accuse them of something unfounded.
> > 3. Get called on it by other countries.
> > 4. Attack anyway
> > 5. Deny reconstruction contracts to countries that wouldn't help in an
> > illegal war.
> >
> > And people are complaining? I don't get it. It looks like a perfect plan
> to
> > boost the economy by giving local companies big contracts.
> >
> > -Kevin
> >   _____
> >
> >
> >
>   _____
>
>
>
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to