::snicker:: now *that* is right-thinking. Take some more Paxil and you won't have to think about the children crushed to death in Afghan bombing raids. <g>

Well put.

Dana

> I personally was against illegaly bombing defenseless civilian people
> and watching friends in the military sent off to die for corrupt war
> profiteers because I hate myself, wish I was dead, and am guilty for
> having things so good - and we might as well throw in that I'm
> generally unpatriotic, treasonous, and hate america. That should sum
> my type of beliefs up perfectly.
>
> /Somebody been readin teh coulter.
>
>
>
> >This was wrong?  Freeing people, saving lives, bringing
> infrastructure.
> >This is all wrong.
> >
> >Ah the politics of those who wish they were dead.  What's wrong guilt
> for
> >having it so good?  Self hatred?
> >
> >I wish I had the John Galt rant from Atlas Shrugged handy.  sums of
> these
> >types of beliefs perfectly.
> >
> >--
> >Timothy Heald
> >Web Portfolio Manager
> >Overseas Security Advisory Council
> >U.S. Department of State
> >571.345.2319
> >
> >The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.
> S.
> >Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have
> these
> >opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This
> e-mail is
> >unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:59 AM
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: Re: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >
> >
> >Personally, I want America to feel this economically. I want the us
> to have
> >to pay the price for lying and attacking with no provocation.
> >
> >I say that as a staunch supporter of America. It's tough love. If we
> do
> >something wrong, we shouldn't reap the benefits. It's that simple. I
> don't
> >want the US to be the Mafia of the world.
> >
> >-Kevin
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:52 AM
> >Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >
> >> the us and the other sixty-odd countries who helped us get to bid.
> now I'm
> >> not arguing the fact that the us companies may get the bulk of the
> >> contracts, but I as a taxpayer would rather my money go to US
> companies
> >than
> >> another countries.
> >>
> >> i am also not arguing that there wont be corruption in the
> contract
> >process,
> >> ahem Halibuton, but it is still better than the French getting my
> money.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:46 AM
> >> To: CF-Community
> >> Subject: Re: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >>
> >>
> >> Why should US companies benefit from a war manufactured by our own
> >country?
> >> When organized crime does that it's called a "protection racket".
> >>
> >> -Kevin
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:32 AM
> >> Subject: RE: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >>
> >> > The countries in question can still do business with Iraq, they
> just
> >cant
> >> > bid on the contracts that the US taxpayers are paying for. They
> can be
> >> hired
> >> > as subcontractors for the contracts as well. I dont see why this
> is such
> >a
> >> > huge deal? Why should the US taxpayers pay french companies to
> rebuild
> >> Iraq
> >> > when they werent willing to support the US efforts in the first
> place?
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:28 AM
> >> > To: CF-Community
> >> > Subject: Bush gives the finger to the world again
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Former top U.S. officials are blasting the Bush administration
> for
> >> reopening
> >> > a rift with Europe by excluding critics of the war from prime
> contracts
> >> for
> >> > Iraq's reconstruction.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html
> ><http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> >> <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> >> > <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105433,00.html>
> >> >
> >> > "I thought we were in the process of acquiring support rather
> than
> >> > alienating it," former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
> (search)
> >> said.
> >> >
> >> > So let me get this straight.
> >> >
> >> > 1. Economy is bad.
> >> > 2. Find a patsy country and accuse them of something unfounded.
> >> > 3. Get called on it by other countries.
> >> > 4. Attack anyway
> >> > 5. Deny reconstruction contracts to countries that wouldn't help
> in an
> >> > illegal war.
> >> >
> >> > And people are complaining? I don't get it. It looks like a
> perfect plan
> >> to
> >> > boost the economy by giving local companies big contracts.
> >> >
> >> > -Kevin
> >> >   _____
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>   _____
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >  _____  
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to