--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:12 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Question to Gamers (Was RE: ROFL! Duke Nukem...)
MOO II is better, in my opinion. Also, if your kid is 13, simpler. I
think I have a copy zipped up around here somewhere, if you want one.
It's not like you're going to find a copy of MOO II at Best Buy. :-)
--benD
John Stanley wrote:
> Civ III is great and so is Master of Orion III
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Question to Gamers (Was RE: ROFL! Duke Nukem...)
>
> Depending on the kids ages and tastes, Civ III has a multiplayer
> version, as does (IIRC) Alpha Centauri. Also, the ever-lovely
StarCraft
> runs on just about anything. Zerg Rush!
>
> --bend
>
> Harkins,Patrick wrote:
>
> > Low-tech/High Enjoyment games:
> >
> >
> > I have some less than cetting-edge computers at my place - a couple
of
> PIIs
> > and the like.
> > Can anyone suggest some older networkable games that kid could have
lost
> of
> > fun with
> > without high-end graphics? Are they all too slow by today's
standards?
> > Doesn't have to be search and destroy type games - could be
anything.
> >
> >
> > tanks,
> > Patrick
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: December 18, 2003 9:29 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: ROFL! Duke Nukem Forever not till 2005
> >
> > Hahahah!
> >
> > Why can't they just say that they have run out of money to develop
the
> > game, and whenever they do release it, it will not match up to the
other
> > titles on the market. It will probably look like it should have
been
> > released 3 years ago.
> >
> > A title cannot be 'in development' for this long and still have any
sort
> > of cohesive vision behind it. Are they ripping out the game engine
every
> > year? Is it going to be 5 Gigs of AI and world? No....its a damned
First
> > Person Shooter. I would think that perhaps for a complex simulation
from
> > the ground up 7 years might be acceptable (and then only with
delays and
> > other unforseen issues). Duke Nukem ain't going to come out, and if
it
> > does I think sadly it may be another DaiKatana.
> >
> > Reading that 3D Realms is funding the development themselves, by
now
> > they must be pretty low on funds. Now *that* could be the reason
it's
> > taking so long assuming people are still working on it.
> > Probably because they have one or two people working on it ;-)
> >
> > HYPERLINK
> >
"http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dukenukemforever/news_6085889.html"ht
> > tp://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dukenukemforever/news_6085889.html
> >
> > -Gel
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003
> > _____
> >
> _____
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
