> Anyone had any experience with this domain or know anything about
> italian laws on spam?
I think Italy, together with some other European countries, was recently sued because they didn't implement the required anti-spam legislation fast enough. But what in the headers implies Italy?
> Maybe you can give me a second opinion. Here's the headers, reading
> these was never my best thing. The prunebelly address that received it
> forwards to a comcast address, is where comcast comes into it.
>
> Received: from miranda.zianet.com ([216.234.192.169])
> by sccrmxc13.comcast.net (sccrmxc13) with SMTP
> id <20040118190533s1300ed4e7e>; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:05:33 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [216.234.192.169]
> Received: (qmail 65059 invoked by uid 1009); 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31
> -0000
> Delivered-To: (taking this out for my user's privacy - dana)
> Received: (qmail 65026 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO libero.it) (211.108.90.4)
> by zianet.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31 -0000
> To: (a different prunebelly address, not the one that received it)
> From: "alton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:04:43 GMT
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears to be something delivered from Korea (211.108.90.4) to Zianet, then from Zianet to ComCast.
Why do you think it is spoofing a prunebelly address?
> I am not including the subject line as it is pretty vile, something
> about what little girls will do for cigarettes. Which was the other
> thing I was wondering. Since this isn't just spam, but is also an
> advertisement for child pornography... aren't some laws getting broken
> here?
Probably. But without full headers it is a bit difficult to see where it came from exactly, so it is not clear where to report it. You might want to just go for the spamvertized site instead of the originator (which undoubtedly is a hacked/misconfigured DSL cluebie).
Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
