if in fact it's child pornography it is also dangerous from a legal point of view. But I keep scripting and ActiveX and all that good stuff turned off anyway. Though I suppose a cookie would be enough, and you can't turn cookies off and not lose your mind.

Dana

>My advice is to never go to the Spamvertised web site under any circumstances.
>That is one way to get your computer infected by malicious code, and serves to
>confirm that your email address is indeed live, and will make you the subject of
>even more spam.
>
>But in reading the headers the Italy source is spoofed, as the IP number of
>211.108.90.4 actually originates in Korea.
>
>======================================
>Stop spam on your domain, Anti-spam solutions
>http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
>For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
>======================================
>Aspire to Inspire before you Retire or Expire!
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 6:57 AM
>Subject: Re:libero.it
>
>
>: dana tierney wrote:
>: > Anyone had any experience with this domain or know anything about
>: > italian laws on spam?
>:
>: I think Italy, together with some other European countries, was recently sued
>because they didn't implement the required anti-spam legislation fast enough.
>But what in the headers implies Italy?
>:
>:
>: > Maybe you can give me a second opinion. Here's the headers, reading
>: > these was never my best thing. The prunebelly address that received it
>: > forwards to a comcast address, is where comcast comes into it.
>: >
>: > Received: from miranda.zianet.com ([216.234.192.169])
>: >     by sccrmxc13.comcast.net (sccrmxc13) with SMTP
>: >     id <20040118190533s1300ed4e7e>; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:05:33 +0000
>: > X-Originating-IP: [216.234.192.169]
>: > Received: (qmail 65059 invoked by uid 1009); 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31
>: >     -0000
>: > Delivered-To: (taking this out for my user's privacy - dana)
>: > Received: (qmail 65026 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31 -0000
>: > Received: from unknown (HELO libero.it) (211.108.90.4)
>: >     by zianet.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2004 19:05:31 -0000
>: > To: (a different prunebelly address, not the one that received it)
>: > From: "alton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>: > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:04:43 GMT
>: > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>: > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>: It appears to be something delivered from Korea (211.108.90.4) to Zianet, then
>from Zianet to ComCast.
>:
>: Why do you think it is spoofing a prunebelly address?
>:
>:
>: > I am not including the subject line as it is pretty vile, something
>: > about what little girls will do for cigarettes. Which was the other
>: > thing I was wondering. Since this isn't just spam, but is also an
>: > advertisement for child pornography... aren't some laws getting broken
>: > here?
>:
>: Probably. But without full headers it is a bit difficult to see where it came
>from exactly, so it is not clear where to report it. You might want to just go
>for the spamvertized site instead of the originator (which undoubtedly is a
>hacked/misconfigured DSL cluebie).
>:
>: Jochem
>:
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to