> But I suppose that if it were possible to detect large quotes it would
also be possible to reply to the sender with an explanation of why this is
not wanted. That should be less intrusive then just deleting what the system
thinks is unwanted quotes, and have a significantly lower inpact when the
system has it wrong.
> I suppose I should start reading up on the possibilities to compare
strings.

That's very dangerous. If you posted to the list and got a rejection notice
that said you had quoted to much, would you repost? We'd lose half of our
people right off the bat. Remember when the banners went in? Even with a
text only option, Sean left. I can see others doing the same, especially
some of our more volatile members of CF-Talk (volatile, but useful).
I'm going to leave an option where you can view the full post as it was
posted in addition to the thread with 'cut down' posts.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to