words, Dana, wouldn't you be exempt?
-d
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: sarbanes-oxley
> incidentally there is a 4 part series on this very subject starting in
this
> week's eWeek magazine. http://www.eweek.com
>
>
>
> ======================================
> Stop spam on your domain, Anti-spam solutions
> http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
> For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> ======================================
> Aspire to Inspire before you Retire or Expire!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Heald, Tim
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:16 PM
> Subject: RE: sarbanes-oxley
>
>
> Your going to need to write policy mainly for this, then go through some
> sort of certification and accreditation, where your responsible parties
> (mainly C level exec types, board members) claim that they accept the
risk
> and that there are appropriate controls in place to mitigate (not
prevent,
> as there is no statistical full prevention) the noted risks.
>
>
> The financial aspect is killer from what I understand, but I have only
> looked into from a security perspective.
>
>
> Document, document, document.
>
> --
> Timothy Heald
> Web Portfolio Manager
> Overseas Security Advisory Council
> U.S. Department of State
> 571.345.2319
>
> The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
> Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
> opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail
is
> unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:37 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: sarbanes-oxley
>
> While I am having federal compliance nightmares, anyone have any info on
how
> sarbanes-oxley applies to non-profits? As best I can see we are exempt
from
> a lot of the stricter audit requirements but board member need to
manifest
> "fiduciary responsibility".... I love stuff like this when I am already
> sleep deprived <g>
> _____
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
