>So, isn't sarbanes-oxley only applicable to public companies? In other
>words, Dana, wouldn't you be exempt?
>
>-d
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:25 PM
>Subject: Re: sarbanes-oxley
>
>
>> incidentally there is a 4 part series on this very subject starting in
>this
>risk
>> and that there are appropriate controls in place to mitigate (not
>prevent,
>is
>how
>> sarbanes-oxley applies to non-profits? As best I can see we are exempt
>from
>> a lot of the stricter audit requirements but board member need to
>manifest
>> "fiduciary responsibility".... I love stuff like this when I am already
>> sleep deprived <g>
>> _____
>>
>>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
