He has personality equivalent to plain yogurt.
He lies - he doesn't have a clue what "real people" are like (and I' not
saying Bush does. but he's more real than Kerry - imo).
I really hate 2 faced people. he wants to "the rich" to pay - when he
himself is rich.
He has more wealth than just about everyone who subscribes to this thread
have - combined. and will ever have.
Tax the rich. BS. I wish Kerry (and all Presidents) would simply tell us the
truth.
Kerry seems to want a foreign run United States.
So - why don't we just hand the country over to the French.
Even better - let the UN run us. that way we can all be mindless robots.
I dislike Kerry so much - I would vote for anyone just to stop Kerry.
I even liked Dean more than Kerry.
and I had a better image of the Democrat Party when it appeared Dean would
be the chosen - to run against Bush.
Pierre
_____
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush criticism hypocracy....
Interesting...
"Some people would like you to think President Bush lied when he talked
about Saddam Hussein's weapons. The funny thing is, many of the
president's
current critics are politicians who made strikingly similar claims about
Iraq in the not-too-distant past. When Bill Clinton was in office, his
fellow Democrats had much to say about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
But if you listen to them now, you might conclude that the entire party
suffers from collective amnesia. Democrats used to talk tough about Iraq.
They did when one of their own....."
http://www.brain-terminal.com/video/nyc-2004-03-20/index.html
http://www.brain-terminal.com/video/nyc-2004-03-20/index.html
There isn't much question that Iraq had the WMD programs in place 10 or
more
years ago.
Where the deceptions came is was the assertion that he CURRENTLY had WMD,
as
well as the implication that he was a terrorist state. These assertions,
brought by members of both parties have already been proven to be completely
false, and that the Bush Administration had the agenda/goal of bringing down
of
Iraq, long before they even took office. This agenda originated during his
father's administration, and well may be one of the driving forces that made
him
pepper his own administration with the holdovers from back then.
The next thing is to "follow the money." that is to track who benefits
from
the fall of Saddam Hussien, whom this country supported "back then" The
money
trail goes direct to Halliburton (Vice President Cheney) and other fat cats
who
are the biggest contributors to the Bush effort.
It is already history that it was Loyal Republicans who kept up the
personal
attacks and contrived scandals to disrupt the previous administration who
still
managed to counter the "Tax and Spend" labels, and reduce the national debt,
preside over the biggest economic growth this country ever experienced, and
turn
traditional Republican budget deficits into a huge surplus.
There is no known Republican administration in the US history that has
presided over Budget Surpluses, and who has not shoved the country deeper
into
debt. This debt must be repaid at some point in time, and that is exactly
what
the Democratic agenda is.
While I personally don't support "Universal Health Care" I do believe that
the
Republicans have given the Health industry, including pharmaceutical
companies
license to continue to rape the American Public. This methodology by the
Republicans cannot be refuted.
As long as Bush campaigns on a bed of Fear tactics, I hope sincerely he
will
be soundly defeated, come November. Even Mickey Mouse or Scooby-Doo would
be
better choices.
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
