your hard earned money from Burger King on Old Navy clothes! I'm truly glad
that you can sleep better. That makes me happy!
Jeff Garza
_____
From: a cantrl. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush criticism hypocracy....
I just want to thank you for keeping us safe with our tax dollars Jeff. I
sleep soundly at night because of the job you do! Keep it up man!
>Larry,
>
>
>
>I have to say, Yes. I am better off under this administration. I work at a
>company that relies heavily on Govt. defense spending. Our industry has
>been growing under the Bush administration due to the increased budgets.
>
>
>
>I guess, you have to ask yourself the same question? Are you better off
>right now than you were under Clinton? I remember hearing that you just
>started a new job at ATCC? Is it a better job than you had before
>(benefits, salary, etc.)? Do you really think that your getting this job
>had anything to do with the current administration? Does it really matter?
>
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
>Jeff Garza
>
> _____
>
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 9:39 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: Bush criticism hypocracy....
>
>
>
>Wow I guess you must have studied long and hard at the site "The
>Republican Platform for Dummies. Pardon that was not exactly fair on
>my part.
>
>The point being is that what are the differences you see between the
>two campaigns? Also you need to ask yourself a serious question, are
>you better off now under Shrub than you were four years ago?
>
>>So Kerry is a better choice than Bush ?
>>
>>
>>
>>He has personality equivalent to plain yogurt.
>
>Says nothing about his policies now does that. In this case I think
>that policies are more important.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>He lies - he doesn't have a clue what "real people" are like (and I' not
>>saying Bush does. but he's more real than Kerry - imo).
>
>Again not a discussion on the ideas put forward, but a personal
>attack. So if you're criticizing Kerry for his background lets not
>forget Shrub . Lets compare what he's done with Shrub in that case.
>Both have been children of privilege. Both went to elite schools. If
>you look at Shrub's background. Its even more elitist than Kerry's.
>Shrub had everything handed to him on a silver platter. When it was
>decided that it was time he needed to work for a living, daddy and
>his buddies got together and set up an oil company for him, then when
>that didn't work out they gave him a baseball franchise - that
>immediately went from a money maker to a money pit.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>I really hate 2 faced people. he wants to "the rich" to pay - when he
>>himself is rich.
>
>And accordingly he will pay his fair share.
>
>So in your words then its OK if you're rich and blatantly favour the rich.
>
>Kerry has certain convictions that he's followed since he left the
>service. LIke working with the VVAW, then other public interest
>groups, then running for office. Much better than getting blotto for
>20 years on drugs and alcohol after sneaking out of real military
>service.
>
>>
>>He has more wealth than just about everyone who subscribes to this thread
>>have - combined. and will ever have.
>>
>>
>>
>>Tax the rich. BS. I wish Kerry (and all Presidents) would simply tell us
>the
>>truth.
>
>lets start with Shrub. Like the truth on his cocaine usage, or his
>alcohol abuse. Or his using of Daddy's influence to get out of
>serving in Vietnam. Or look at the allegations that are surfacing
>this week about the deliberate ignoring of terrorist threats leading
>up to 9/11. Or his lying about WMD, and Iraqi threats to the world,
>or the Baathist links to Al-Queda?
>
>How about the lies that he and his administration used to get
>approval for the Iraqi invasion. Directly or indirectly Shrub is
>responsible for the deaths of hundreds of US servicemen and women,
>and possibly tens of thousands of Iraqis. Is it better to support
>such a blatant liar.
>
>He promised that the Iraq conflict would only take a short time, and
>last only a few months. Well we're running up on the 1 year
>anniversary, with no end in site.
>
>He also stated in that it would result in less terrorism and that
>Americans would be safer because of it. Are we safer, and has there
>been fewer terrorism incidents?
>
>If anything is been the opposite.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Kerry seems to want a foreign run United States.
>
>Would you mid rephrasing this into English. Its quite
>incomprehensible. It seems like you're missing out on most to the
>rules on the English language.
>
>
>Just waiting for the black helicopters to start flying overhead now
>aren't we. Can I suggest a tin foil had to block the evil Q rays from
>finding you. If you like I can suggestions some professionals in your
>area that might help.
>
>
>Lets see given your name Pierre, now doesn't that suggest a motive
>for wanting the French to take over.
>
>As for Shrub, give his absolute failures, with the war on Terror, the
>Iraq Conflict, and the economy (how many jobs have permanently left
>the country because of his policies), his whole presidency has been a
>failure. Given that he's never really held a real job, we need to
>give him a taste of the real world, and fire him from his current job.
>
>larry
>--
>
>Larry C. Lyons
>
>========================================================
>Life is Complex. It has both real and imaginary parts.
>========================================================
>Chaos, Panic and Disorder. My work here is done.
>
> _____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
