Yeah, another thing I should have mentioned is that we were really a
Fusebox/FLiP shop, so we had a good framework for CF that really saved
us a lot of time. In that sense it was a double shot to our development
speeds as FB allowed us to reuse and repurpose code a lot. Even in ASP,
and PHP projects where we used the ASP/PHP versions of FB.

Like I said, I think that .NET has its place -- it just wasn't a good
fit for us at the time. I also don't think it would be a good fit for
the government agency I'm working for now either -- we need to optimize
every minute we spend on a project, and CF allows for that.

-Bret

Robyn Follen wrote:

> I can completely understand that - .NET DOES take a lot longer to code in.
> It makes some relatively simple things much more complex.  I like it because
> it is more structured and really forces you to plan out projects more than
> the RAD nature of CF.  That said, it's slightly discouraging to make the
> switch, because things you used to be able to do in a couple of hours now
> take more time.  
>
>
> Robyn
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to