Re: Animals. Those service men and women were animals.

[dana tierney]

I actually like the Nader agenda. It is just not the time. It is critical that Bush not win, and Nader can't. Not this year anyway. I think the Greens should concentrate on the House and the Senate. I reserve judgement on Kerry. He doesn't have much magnetism and I don't know what I think of his character but here is the key thing for me: he is not responsible for the Patriot Act. He is not the one saying the Constitution does not apply to enemy combattants even on US soil.

If you can stand it, here is more on the Iraqi prisoner thing:

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040510-075105-6834r

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5090507

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4944094/

Seventy to *ninety* percent detained in error? God. That should do wonders in the battle for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.

Dana


>Well, it sucks to have to vote democrat, but I am not voting for Nader
>because that will just help dubya. If jr. wins, I'm moving to Canada. Anyone
>got an extra room?
>
>As an aside, I saw an election ad for Kerry and Bush this weekend. Kerry was
>just talking about his war record, and Bush was attacking Kerry. Almost all
>of the Bush ad's I've seen have attacked Kerry, and not really taked about
>what he has "accomplished" these past three plus years in office.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 9:19 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Animals. Those service men and women were animals.
>
>
>I'll spare everyone my opinionon the last election :P But Gel is right, this
>one coming up is critical. If Bush wins, kiss the Constitution good-bye. It
>won't *be* America.  
>
>As someone said on some site I saw this weekend: they are counting on us to
>be too busy, to not have time. They are counting on us to not be paying
>attention.
>
>Dana
>
>  _____

---

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

---