you clarified your point, so I accept all of your counter-statements in that
arena. In other words I have only criticized the initial statement and
therefore only discussing the original statement.
But I'm perfectly willing to let this drop as a bad misunderstanding.
Virtual handshake?
Jim Davis
_____
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 11:26 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Animals. Those service men and women were animals.
I am stating now quite clearly, that you misunderstood.
I also stated quite clearly in my follow up email that those statements
were made
with regards President Bush's apparent view of his America.
My last email was sarcasm and I said so.
Feel free to continue misrepresenting my statements if that's your
pleasure though :-)
Democratic countries which have leadership that does not reflect the
will of the population, vote that leadership out of office.
Look at Spain for a good example.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Davis
Don't argue the other side of the coin here.
This all started because you said that a) The American people don't
consider
themselves subject to world criticism and b) that the American people
were
all religious zealots who believe their god better than others.
Both statements were blankets and neither mentioned Bush.
To say of any country, democrat or not, that the actions of its leaders
represent the true feelings of its entire populace is wrong,
stereotypical
and insulting. Issues aren't that black and white and never will be.
Jim Davis
--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.241 / Virus Database: 262.9.19 - Release Date: 5/10/2004
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
