#140: Clarifying the role of attributes on boundary variables.
-----------------------------+------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  davidhassell    |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:  enhancement     |     Status:  new
  Priority:  medium          |  Milestone:
 Component:  cf-conventions  |    Version:
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:  boundary variable, attribute
-----------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment (by davidhassell):

 Hello Karl,

 On a re-read, I agree that we can omit text as you suggest. That would
 give (changing one "the" to an "a"):

   If a parametric coordinate variable with a `formula_terms` attribute
 (ref section 4.3.2) also has a `bounds` attribute, it is strongly
 recommended that its boundary variable has a `formula_terms` attribute
 too. Because the same standard name must describe both variables, the
 formula must have the same terms (as specified in Appendix D), but a
 different variable must be named by the two `formula_terms` attributes for
 any term which depends on the vertical dimension, because the boundary
 variables have one more dimension. The boundary variables for these
 formula terms may also be identified by `bounds` attributes of the formula
 terms variables that are auxiliary coordinate variables. In that case, a
 `formula_terms` attribute of the boundary variable and the bounds of the
 formula terms variables must be consistent.

 Thanks, David

--
Ticket URL: <https://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/140#comment:14>
CF Metadata <http://cf-convention.github.io/>
CF Metadata

Reply via email to