Ditto. There will be many who can't parse the shorter form. And since
often there is confusion about the role of canonical units vis-a-vis
standard names, anything that clarifies or augments that information
will be helpful.
John
On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Roy Lowry wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
I would support Phil's suggestion. I have been asked to clarify
this before.
Cheers, Roy.
Jonathan Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/22/08 8:57 AM >>>
Dear Phil
Do you think it would it be useful to
add a short footnote to this effect to section 3.3, or is the use
of the
phrase "physically equivalent (not necessarily identical)" in that
section self-evident?
I don't know, really - I wonder what others think?
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
