Hi,

It appears that the wrong email address for the CF list was used for some of the emails in the conversation below. Hence, I am forwarding the final email for the record.

Best wishes,

     Philip

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith        Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division
[email protected]                   Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
+1 925 4236634                 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA94550, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:15:39
From: Keith Lindsay <[email protected]>
To: Philip J. Cameronsmith1 <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Ernst Maier-Reimer <[email protected]>,
    Corinne Le Quere <[email protected]>,
    Bruce Hackett <[email protected]>,
    Thomas LOUBRIEU <[email protected]>,
    Laurent Bopp <[email protected]>,
    Pierre Friedlingstein <[email protected]>,
    James Orr <[email protected]>, Laurence Crosnier <[email protected]>,
    Chris Jones <[email protected]>, [email protected],
    Karl Taylor <[email protected]>, Yann BARZIC <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] BGC output for CMIP5 simulations

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Philip J. Cameronsmith1 wrote:

Hi Keith, et al.

By no3 I assume you mean the negatively charged nitrate ion (NO3-). In which case I recommend using 'nitrate' in the standard name instead of 'no3'. This will then be consistent with existing standard names, and avoid confusion with the uncharged nitrate radical (NO3).

In looking at the standard name table I think it would also be more consistent to use _due_to_ instead of _from_. The latter is mainly used for physical directions, eg _into_sea_water_from_rivers, while the former is mainly used when when the quantity is changing _due_to_ another process, eg tendency_of_air_temperature_due_to_shortwave_heating.

Hence, I suggest you consider the following:

net_primary_mole_productivity_of_carbon_due_to_nitrate

Best wishes,

   Philip


Philip,

Thanks for the feedback. Your comments are on target. I propose going with your standard name.

Keith

******************************************************************
Keith Lindsay                http://*www.*cgd.ucar.edu/oce/klindsay/
email: [email protected]   phone: 303-497-1722   fax: 303-497-1700
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to