Okay, I have overcome my writer's block and started this ticket #76: https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/76
Please feel free to join the discussion on the trac ticket, if you are interested in this topic. --Dave A. NOAA/PSD/CIRES On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Dave Allured <[email protected]> wrote: > I will be glad to open a trac ticket. Let me have a day or so draft > some amendment wording. My intention is to use Unidata's > recommendations in the NetCDF Users Guide as a starting point, and > include notes about conformance and avoiding conflicts. > > --Dave > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Gregory > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear all - such as Roy, John (Graybeal) and Mark (Hedley) >> >> Would someone have time to open a trac ticket to propose a change to the CF >> convention, in order to clarify the Conventions attribute, following all this >> useful email discussion? It seems to me that it would be good to make a >> definite decision. I think it's been recognised that, whatever the syntax, it >> is up to the data-writer to ensure that multiple conventions do not conflict, >> so we ought to state this as well as defining the permissible syntax. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
