Dear Heiko

> I just had a short side-discussion with Eizi, and we settled on
> 'type', i.e. we propose the standard names:
> 
> high_type_cloud_area_fraction
> middle_type_cloud_area_fraction
> low_type_cloud_area_fraction

These look fine to me. As you said to John, I hope that "type" would trigger
people to look up the definition.

Best wishes and thanks

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to