Dear all My colleague David Hassell has compiled a digest of the status of open CF trac tickets. This can be found at http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~david/cf_trac_summary.html
It has a line for each ticket, giving a summary, the names of the proposer and moderator (if any), and its status. Those which are shown as green have been accepted for inclusion in the next version of the CF standards document. Some are currently under discussion, and there are a few where the discussion has not finished and has gone dormant. I think this is a useful tool for keeping track of trac. In particular, it is the role of moderators of tickets to keep the discussion going and move it towards a conclusion. Not all the enhancement tickets have moderators, and if people who think they have a good grasp of the discussion would like to volunteer, that is welcome. Being a moderator does not prevent you from expressing a view, but in summarising the discussion the moderator should be fair and objective, of course. The rules are at http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/governance/governance-rules. (Defect tickets do not require moderators, because there should not be any substantial discussion.) David expects to update this table approximately every couple of weeks. Comments are welcome. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
